Open HHS81 opened 6 years ago
Really looking forward to this one!
Mee too!
Yep, I'm on board!
I am so on board for this. We need to make all the use we can out of the C172, it's just too good to not be overhauled.
@stuartbuchanan I have created a new branch called C182T, merged and synchronized your files manually. Unless I forgot something, the branch C182T is uptodate, and all errors removed. So you can work from this branch on. Please @stuartbuchanan @hbeni @gilbertohasnofb check if everything is correct, then I will merge the the branch into master. I think #258 will give us a roadmap.
Are we aiming for this cockpit layout? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rlrEUt9oMvY ?
What i found in the C182T
branch:
Hi Benedikt,
I've not yet implemented the transponder in the FG1000, which is why it's not set. (The UI is a real pain for this with various timers)
In terms of cockpit layout, the video is pretty close, though I can't see the bottom of the panel. However, in the medium term I want to replace the KAP140 autopilot with the Garmin GFC700. That should be fairly straightforward, though I need to check if the 182 autopilot configuration include PIDs for NAV etc.
Yes, performance is an issue. What do you mean by "4x"?
-Stuart
On Mon, Jan 7, 2019 at 6:07 PM Benedikt Hallinger notifications@github.com wrote:
@stuartbuchanan https://github.com/stuartbuchanan I have created a new branch called C182T, merged and synchronized your files manually. Unless I forgot something, the branch C182T is uptodate, and all errors removed. So you can work from this branch on. Please @stuartbuchanan https://github.com/stuartbuchanan @hbeni https://github.com/hbeni @gilbertohasnofb https://github.com/gilbertohasnofb check if everything is correct, then I will merge the the branch into master. I think #258 https://github.com/HHS81/c182s/issues/258 will give us a roadmap.
Are we aiming for this cockpit layout? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rlrEUt9oMvY ?
What i found in the C182T branch:
- Splash screen and Launcher image still c182s
- failures: they seem not to be initialized (failures nasal file not called from set file? only default ones work, like ADF)
- The default-factory transponder code in aircraft options is not set initially (maybe we should hide this if not applicable?)
- Cabin Temp tooltips are not up to date (missing change indicator)
- Performance is an issue at my machine, it gets nearly unplayable at 4x
— You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/HHS81/c182s/issues/258#issuecomment-452026350, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AL4umNuknPhp7r_Jx6aWvF8CxLFvtMFaks5vA4zFgaJpZM4SBc9B .
By 4x i meant time acceleration. With 1x it runs OK here (tough not perfectly smooth)
C182T G1000 with KAP140 POH: https://axenty.com/resources/PIM/C182T%20PIM%20(NAV%20III).pdf
More infos: http://oh085.ohwg.cap.gov/operations/training-scenarios---g1000-fits
C182T G1000 GFC700 POH: http://www.rmr.cap.gov/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/cessna-ct182t-nav-iii-turbo-poh.pdf
@stuartbuchanan the 182 autopilot makes use of the KAP140 files. It is better to write your own.
@stuartbuchanan Why the PFD updates so slow, and where can you cange it? Canvas seems very difficult to make, and the wiki is spammed with quotes instead of usefull informations....
Hi All,
I've implemented the transponder - use the XPDR key on the PFD.
The PFD updated at 10Hz by default. You can change that by setting /instrumentation/FG1000/adc-update-frequency at startup time.
Actually, the value is the update spacing, so 10Hz = 0.1. I'm going to fix that so that it is a proper frequency.
-Stuart
@stuartbuchanan Since some weeks I´m busy with real life job, 10hours a day at work are the minimum this week. So I`m not able to fix the other issues left here. But it looks like it will be better in at least 2 weeks.
Nethertheless I follow the forum a bit, and I read your comment on the C182S-fdm. The C182S uses real coefficients, and what I read about the left-pushing tendency on the real one I consider the behavior as realistic. You will have a strong left-pushing tendency at full power at very low speeds, decreasing with speed, and increasing again with alpha-deg. At cruise speeds you can take the feets from the pedals, it does not need any pedal input then while turning. What the aircraft makes it more difficult is the constant speed prop and the higher speed. Also it is quite nose-heavy, there had been a lot of accidents where the nose-gear has been slammed into the ground while touch-down. See also: http://www.dviaviation.com/files/45136649.pdf
Maybe I should get back to the forum to answer him directly....
Hello. Im tying to implement the left switches panel for this. Im posting the progress on the forums.
https://forum.flightgear.org/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=34571&p=362201#p362201
@paju1986 the inactivity you can see here is due to real life. Benedikt has so much as I know family, myself is beside working, back in university to get a master degree.
It looks good, do you use the Flight Manual as reference? Please make sure, that ALL textures needed for the whole instruments panel can be put later in ONE texture map. Less objects, less textures needed makes it easier for lighting maps and of course better framerates!
This is more a memo and checklist for myself creating the Cessna 182 T Garmin 1000 model 2004-2010.
Config:
Exterior:
Interior:
Panel:
Seats:
Cabin walls and ceiling
Electrical System:
FDM: