I am using Clair3 for SNV/indel detection from ONT sequence data. The sequence data is from an amplicon sequencing experiment (high read coverage) of a mixed SARS-CoV-2 sample.
I can identify multiple variant sites in IGV that are missing or 0/0 in the resulting VCF files.
E.g. below, a SNV with ~0.17 ALT-allele ratio and a 9bp indel with ~150/770 reads supporting ALT
The only two variant records of full_alignment.vcf.gz in the screenshot region are
NC_045512.2 21618 . C . 20.38 RefCall F GT:GQ:DP:AD:AF 0/0:20:884:692:0.7828
NC_045512.2 21632 . T . 9.12 RefCall F GT:GQ:DP:AD:AF 0/0:9:883:721:0.8165
The record at 21618 has a FILTER=RefCall but has ~0.22 ALT allele ratio according to the VCF record. Since the snp_min_af is 0.08, shouldn't this be some sort of ALT call?
Also, the 21632 position's record is a REF call. With an AF of ~0.19, shouldn't this be some sort of an indel ALT call?
Both records are not within merge_output.vcf.gz. I assume only FILTER=PASS records are making it to the merged output?
Expected behavior
According to my Clair3 call I expected SNVs >0.08 AF to be 0/1 or 1/1 and FILTER equal PASS or LowQual. I expected an indel call at 21632.
Dear Clair3 dev team,
Background
I am using Clair3 for SNV/indel detection from ONT sequence data. The sequence data is from an amplicon sequencing experiment (high read coverage) of a mixed SARS-CoV-2 sample.
Clair3 call
Issue
I can identify multiple variant sites in IGV that are missing or 0/0 in the resulting VCF files. E.g. below, a SNV with ~0.17 ALT-allele ratio and a 9bp indel with ~150/770 reads supporting ALT The only two variant records of
full_alignment.vcf.gz
in the screenshot region areThe record at 21618 has a
FILTER=RefCall
but has ~0.22 ALT allele ratio according to the VCF record. Since thesnp_min_af
is 0.08, shouldn't this be some sort of ALT call?Also, the 21632 position's record is a REF call. With an AF of ~0.19, shouldn't this be some sort of an indel ALT call?
Both records are not within
merge_output.vcf.gz
. I assume onlyFILTER=PASS
records are making it to the merged output?Expected behavior
According to my Clair3 call I expected SNVs >0.08 AF to be 0/1 or 1/1 and FILTER equal PASS or LowQual. I expected an indel call at 21632.
Additional info
Clair3 version: 1.0.8 Clair3 model: r1041_e82_400bps_hac_g632 OS: Ubuntu 20.04.6 LTS
Might be related to #314