Hello,
The outputs from running ClairS on PacBio (hifi_revio platform) are providing less than 5 somatic SNVs. We identified multiple high-confidence somatic variants from short-read sequencing on same set of samples, so we are expecting more than the observed somatic hits from corresponding PacBio sequencing.
On troubleshooting, log file 3-1_CPT.log for creating pair tensor show zero tensors generated for all chunks across all chromosomes, and 3-2_PREDICT.log similarly show zero processed positions across all chunks. Logs 1_EC.log, 2-1_CPT.log and 2-2_PREDICT.log show there are positions being processed until step 2 but being filtered in step 3. Log file 5_MV.log shows more than 100k full-alignment variants filtered by pileup .
I'm wondering what might be causing most variants to be filtered, and if there were specific parameter values that need tweaking for this set of samples. Any hints/resources will be helpful, thank you.
Hello, The outputs from running ClairS on PacBio (hifi_revio platform) are providing less than 5 somatic SNVs. We identified multiple high-confidence somatic variants from short-read sequencing on same set of samples, so we are expecting more than the observed somatic hits from corresponding PacBio sequencing.
On troubleshooting, log file 3-1_CPT.log for creating pair tensor show zero tensors generated for all chunks across all chromosomes, and 3-2_PREDICT.log similarly show zero processed positions across all chunks. Logs 1_EC.log, 2-1_CPT.log and 2-2_PREDICT.log show there are positions being processed until step 2 but being filtered in step 3. Log file 5_MV.log shows more than 100k full-alignment variants filtered by pileup .
I'm wondering what might be causing most variants to be filtered, and if there were specific parameter values that need tweaking for this set of samples. Any hints/resources will be helpful, thank you.