lmckenzi
commented
2 weeks ago Do this. It will involve exposing that a CodeSystem is a supplement in much the same way that the publisher surfaces that StructureDefinitions are logical models vs. extensions vs. data type profiles vs. resource profiles. Once that's done, we'll need to update the base template to handle this when generating the artifacts list. (It would actually be a good idea to distinguish fragments and metadata-only instances too so there's an option of categorizing them differently too.)
Feature request: Make a separate heading for CodeSystems that are supplements only (which I kind of miss on eg. https://hl7.dk/fhir/core/1.1.0/terminology.html)