Closed jafeltra closed 1 year ago
You did exactly what I asked for, but now I'm wondering... Do we need to keep the R5-related changes (like CodeableReference and integer64) marked as TU since they are TU in R5? @markkramerus, what do you think?
2ec4004 adds back in TU markings around CodeableReference and integer64 references since R5 will still mark those as TU.
@markkramerus - I was wrong before. I didn't see CodeableReference
or integer64
marked as TU, so I assumed they were not TU. But that was wrong. As it turns out, according to this page, everything introduced in R5 is trial-use.
@markkramerus - I just updated the PR to remove the TU on the Overview page -- thanks for catching that one I completely missed. I also updated the version to 3.0.0-ballot
.
This PR removes all TU marking from the FSH Language Reference. All the support for adding TU and the appropriate background color to sections and table rows/columns are left in for any future TU features we may have.
I also made some very small styling adjustments to Table 10 and Table 12, but I can easily revert those if we don't like them.