Outline Medium Fidelity Peer Review/Attestation Flow

[TravisWyche]

Our first pass of the meta machine diagram implies the use of decentralized publication tools (PermaPress, CCR/DUCE/DIN, or similar) with accountability features (Hats + Smart Invoice + Hypercerts, or similar) to move towards P2P review and/or attestation networks (Factland, Seed Protocol, EAS variants, or similar).

Problem:

• This "middle zone" has many different paths that prioritize for a range of qualitative and quantitative data outputs, aggregated from the onboarding phase and pushed forward to supplement the retroactive phase. Too many choices will inhibit clear navigation. We need to research these paths and understand what works for our users' needs.

Hypothesis:

• One path might be focused on on-chain IP, licensing, decentralized content creation etc.
• Another path seems to emphasize peer review, attestation, trust networks, and impact validation, etc.

Resources:

[TravisWyche]

Started a FigJam to start mapping the details of this flow: https://www.figma.com/file/HdDIkSSbDouzeDe3ublBrw/Moar-Fidelity-Meta?type=whiteboard&node-id=0%3A1&t=JTwaRubRDKMbMzaA-1

Next:

• Need to research apps we're interested in building with EAS. PermaPress/Seed seems like a good first start.
• May try to explore EAS alternatives especially relevant to journalists, such as Factland prediction market/betting mechanism. Hopefully will be able to conduct user interviews to further develop this design space later this month.

[TravisWyche]

Sketched out a flow incorporating PermaPress (away from speculations of CCR), Karma Gap, Deresy, etc. Will iterate further after our sprint.