Open EvanKirshenbaum opened 5 months ago
This one is trivial, but I'm adding the issue to have something to refer to in the commit.
Currently, if you want to identify a well, you say
well #1 well #(n+1)
The syntax is the same for heaters, chillers, extraction points, and magnets.
If you want, on the other hand, to talk about a pad within a well, you say
w[1] w[n+1]
This is ugly for a couple of reaons:
well
well pad
It would be more consistent to use a hybrid between attribute syntax and numbered item syntax:
w's pad#1 w.pad #1
possibly with synonyms of internal pad, interior pad, well pad.
internal pad
interior pad
This one is trivial, but I'm adding the issue to have something to refer to in the commit.
Currently, if you want to identify a well, you say
The syntax is the same for heaters, chillers, extraction points, and magnets.
If you want, on the other hand, to talk about a pad within a well, you say
This is ugly for a couple of reaons:
well
is awell pad
.It would be more consistent to use a hybrid between attribute syntax and numbered item syntax:
possibly with synonyms of
internal pad
,interior pad
,well pad
.Migrated from internal repository. Originally created by @EvanKirshenbaum on Feb 11, 2023 at 5:02 PM PST.