HTTPArchive / almanac.httparchive.org

HTTP Archive's annual "State of the Web" report made by the web community
https://almanac.httparchive.org
Apache License 2.0
601 stars 164 forks source link

Trends 2024 #3618

Open nrllh opened 4 months ago

nrllh commented 4 months ago

Trends 2024

If you're interested in contributing to the Trends chapter of the 2024 Web Almanac, please reply to this issue and indicate which role or roles best fit your interest and availability: author, reviewer, analyst, and/or editor. You might be interested in exploring the changes to this year's version here.

This is our first chapter on understanding non-technical trends on the HTTPArchive data and we believe that there is huge potential for content analysis using HTTPArchive data. To delve into this domain, we are introducing a non-technical section. Our goal is to uncover insights into various trends β€” social, economic, political, and technical β€” reflected in the webpage content we crawl and evaluate. Methodologies like language models (e.g., BERT) offer promising opportunities for such analysis.

Content team

Lead Authors Reviewers Analysts Editors Coordinator
- - - - - - -
Expand for more information about each role πŸ‘€ - The **[content team lead](https://github.com/HTTPArchive/almanac.httparchive.org/wiki/Content-Team-Leads'-Guide)** is the chapter owner and responsible for setting the scope of the chapter and managing contributors' day-to-day progress. - **[Authors](https://github.com/HTTPArchive/almanac.httparchive.org/wiki/Authors'-Guide)** are subject matter experts and lead the content direction for each chapter. Chapters typically have one or two authors. Authors are responsible for planning the outline of the chapter, analyzing stats and trends, and writing the annual report. - **[Reviewers](https://github.com/HTTPArchive/almanac.httparchive.org/wiki/Reviewers'-Guide)** are also subject matter experts and assist authors with technical reviews during the planning, analyzing, and writing phases. - **[Analysts](https://github.com/HTTPArchive/almanac.httparchive.org/wiki/Analysts'-Guide)** are responsible for researching the stats and trends used throughout the Almanac. Analysts work closely with authors and reviewers during the planning phase to give direction on the types of stats that are possible from the dataset, and during the analyzing/writing phases to ensure that the stats are used correctly. - **[Editors](https://github.com/HTTPArchive/almanac.httparchive.org/wiki/Editors'-Guide)** are technical writers who have a penchant for both technical and non-technical content correctness. Editors have a mastery of the English language and work closely with authors to help wordsmith content and ensure that everything fits together as a cohesive unit. - The **[section coordinator](https://github.com/HTTPArchive/almanac.httparchive.org/wiki/Section-Leads'-Guide)** is the overall owner for all chapters within a section like "User Experience" or "Page Content" and helps to keep each chapter on schedule. _Note: The time commitment for each role varies by the chapter's scope and complexity as well as the number of contributors._ For an overview of how the roles work together at each phase of the project, see the [Chapter Lifecycle](https://github.com/HTTPArchive/almanac.httparchive.org/wiki/Chapter-Lifecycle) doc.

Milestone checklist

0. Form the content team

1. Plan content

2. Gather data

3. Validate results

4. Draft content

5. Publication

6. Virtual conference

Chapter resources

Refer to these 2024 Privacy resources throughout the content creation process: πŸ“„ Google Docs for outlining and drafting content πŸ” SQL files for committing the queries used during analysis πŸ“Š Google Sheets for saving the results of queries πŸ“ Markdown file for publishing content and managing public metadata πŸ’» Collab notebook for collaborative coding in Python - if needed πŸ’¬ #web-almanac-trends on Slack for team coordination

neriiavr commented 4 months ago

I'm interested being an editor

thibaudcolas commented 3 months ago

@nrllh this feels like an interesting but tough chapter, could you provide more details? ("further updates will follow soon!"). It’d help as I consider which chapter(s) to get involved with this year.

One thing I’d be interested in personally is proportion of AI-generated content on the web over time. In a general sense, or for something like alternative text for images, or e.g. video captions. No idea how to go about this in terms of data analysis though.

ianand commented 2 months ago

One thing I’d be interested in personally is proportion of AI-generated content on the web over time. In a general sense, or for something like alternative text for images, or e.g. video captions. No idea how to go about this in terms of data analysis though.

This is hard to detect. One possibility though is to analyze the Terms of Use / Privacy Policy pages to figure out the percentage of them that disclose use of AI by processors or subprocessors, which may be required to be disclosed on certain jurisdictions. That won't address the generation of content though and likely only covers how submitted information is used. (As an aside, I expect in the future AI will be used in rendering content as well during the generation of the semantic content so the definition of "AI generated" could get murky.)