search

HUPO-PSI / mzTab

mzTab Reporting MS-based Proteomics and Metabolomics Results
https://hupo-psi.github.io/mzTab
37 stars 16 forks source link

Support ORCID in MTD secition #202

Open sneumann opened 2 years ago

sneumann commented 2 years ago

Hi, in addition to the name and eMail, the MTD section should support the ORCID as an optional persistent identifier for people somewhere near:

https://github.com/HUPO-PSI/mzTab/blob/master/specification_document-releases/2_0-Metabolomics-Release/mzTab_format_specification_2_0-M_release.adoc#6215-contact1-n-email

[[contact1-n-orcid]]
==== contact[1-n]-orcid

[cols=",",]
|===================================================
|*Description* |The contact’s Open Researcher Contributor Identifier (ORCID).
|*Type* |String
|*Mandatory* |False
|*Example* a|
....
MTD contact[1]-email 0000-0002-1825-0097
…
MTD contact[2]-email 0000-0002-9079-593X
....
|===================================================

This applies to multiple mzTab-*, and could go in at the earliest convenience of the respective standards. Please don't close the issue upon adding to one of the standards, instead remove the label e.g. proteomics-part since it'll need to still be added to the next metabolomics (point ?) release.

Yours, Steffen

nilshoffmann commented 2 years ago

Seems like a good idea. I would propose to use the orcid suffix. An orcid consists of four four number blocks, separated by a hyphen. 

MTD contact[1]-orcid 0000-0001-5000-0007

See https://support.orcid.org/hc/en-us/articles/360006897674-Structure-of-the-ORCID-Identifier for the ORCID identifier structure.

nilshoffmann commented 2 years ago

@andrewrobertjones @sneumann Do we have an instruction manual on how to proceed with incremental version changes of spec docs? I would like to bump the version to 2.0.1 when I incorporate this change, since it is an additional element and should be transparent to older version readers and writers. The element will be optional. Current document version is 2.0.0-Final March 2019 (RELEASE). Should we open an official merge window of a few weeks / months to gather feedback or additions?

nilshoffmann commented 1 year ago

Proposed change to the spec doc is in #209

sneumann commented 1 year ago

Are there other changes pending that could be suggested as 2.0.1 and decided en-bloc at the PSI Spring Meeting 2023 ? Yours, Steffen