Closed noedelta closed 8 years ago
Logged In: YES user_id=545117 Originator: NO
A point for consideration however - if we are now going to be able to do a mapping to a wider range of external CVs and eventually intend to replace the PTMs with PSI-MOD should we also map the "enzymatic study" terms to GO and leave them to further develop these, as we are redundant to their efforts. They already have a full description of 2-component signal transduction btw.
Sandra
Original comment by: orchard
Logged In: YES user_id=653048 Originator: NO
Ok for the biological roles, I am not clear wheather you want the assay or the interaction type or both.
Original comment by: luisa_montecchi
Logged In: YES user_id=719654 Originator: YES
>Ok for the biological roles, I am not clear wheather you want the assay or >the interaction type or both.
to clarify, the optimal (at least from my point of view :o) would be: enzymatic reaction: phosphotransfer enzymatic reaction assay: phosphotransfer assay biological role: phosphate acceptor, phosphate donor
Sandra, can you point me to the place with the relevant PSI-MOD info ? I've tried OLS but found nothing about reactions under PSI-MOD branch :o(
lukasz
Original comment by: lukasz99
Logged In: YES user_id=653048 Originator: NO
added see from MI:0841 to MI:0844
Original comment by: luisa_montecchi
Original comment by: luisa_montecchi
Relevant PMID: 16712436
In this particular case the phosphate is transferred between two proteins of a phosphorelay system. Phosphorylation/dephosphorylation terms cannot be used as both should be applied whereas interaction cannot be annotated with more than one interaction type term.
'phosphotransfer assay' can be, in principle, bypassed by using, depending on circumstances, kinase/phosphatase terms but having an assay term mirroring the enzymatic reaction type seems reasonable...
in addition, 'phosphate donor' and 'phosphate acceptor' as biological roles seem to be appropriate...
lukasz
Reported by: lukasz99