\'putative self\' role: for unresolved intra/inter self intera

[noedelta]

When fusion proteins are used and a specific experimental role cannot be determined since it is not known if the interaction is intra or inter molecular, we annotate these with role neutral for present but a more specific term could be created. This new term 'putative self' (or any better suggestion) would be a generic parent of the existing 'fluorescence acceptor donor pair'.

Note this 'putative self' role could also make the curation issues about self phosphorilation more explicit.

Reported by: luisa_montecchi

[noedelta]

• assigned_to: nobody --> lukasz99
• summary: putative self role: for unresolved intra/inter self interact --> 'putative self' role: for unresolved intra/inter self int

Original comment by: luisa_montecchi

[noedelta]

• summary: 'putative self' role: for unresolved intra/inter self int --> 'putative self' role: for unresolved intra/inter self intera

Original comment by: luisa_montecchi

[noedelta]

Logged In: YES user_id=719654 Originator: NO

can you please provide an example of paper with experiment to be annotated this way ?

lukasz

Original comment by: lukasz99

[noedelta]

Logged In: YES user_id=653048 Originator: YES

see the calmoduline 'fluorescence acceptor donor pair' paper 17027503

Original comment by: luisa_montecchi

[noedelta]

Logged In: YES user_id=653048 Originator: YES

see next release MI:0898

Original comment by: luisa_montecchi

[noedelta]

• summary: 'putative self' role: for unresolved intra/inter self intera --> \'putative self\' role: for unresolved intra/inter self intera
• status: open --> closed

Original comment by: luisa_montecchi