Closed noedelta closed 8 years ago
Logged In: YES user_id=653048 Originator: NO
In the MIF schema confidence unit is an 'open CV type' I am not sure we should create that branch without more thoughts about statiscal validations as well.
Original comment by: luisa_montecchi
Agree with Luisa. Can I suggest we ask Hagen Blankenburg to take a look at this and draft an outline for this branch. See hagen@mpi-inf.mpg.de and http://dasmi.bioinf.mpi-inf.mpg.de.
Original comment by: ian_oslo
Proposal from Mario Albrecht
Interaction confidence Replication-based (no of experiments) Structure-based (Protein domain IDs, 3D structure Function-based (GO terms, function predictions) Location-based (tissue specificity, GO compartment terms) Network-based (interaction partners, topological parameters, comparison with genetic interactions) Standrd-based (references sets aka gold standards) Literature based (co-occurrence of terms) Method-based (No. different methods observed by)
Original comment by: orchard
Branch added, as discussed in Heidelberg
Original comment by: orchard
Original comment by: orchard
this one is needed to start populating interaction & participant identification confidenceList elements within MIF25. There's not much to put in there at the moment - most likely just confidence participant confidence interaction confidence replicate count (technical replicate count) Interaction Sequence Tag (with PMID:11283351 as a reference)
lukasz
Reported by: lukasz99