Closed noedelta closed 8 years ago
noedelta
commented
16 years ago Logged In: YES user_id=719654 Originator: NO
autoradiography is feature detection method (say radioactive phosphate) it seems to be quite distinct from molecular weight estimation to justify separate terms ?
I'm afraid I'm lost re: labelling - can you please explain once more ?
lukasz
Original comment by: lukasz99
noedelta
commented
16 years ago Logged In: YES user_id=653048 Originator: NO
Sandra is right, autoradiography is also in participant detection as child of nucleotide sequence identification I agree this relation should disappear and autoradiography remain only in feature detection method
Original comment by: luisa_montecchi
noedelta
commented
16 years ago Logged In: YES user_id=653048 Originator: NO
december 2007 CV release term not deleted as participant detection but moved under tag visualisation
Original comment by: luisa_montecchi
noedelta
commented
16 years ago Original comment by: luisa_montecchi
We now have a separation of "autoradiography" and "molecular weight estimation by autoradioraphy". This is causing confusion and I'm not convinced we need two terms - is autoradiography ever used if the participant is not predetermined?. Also as we use labelling as a tag in Features, the final term should also be a child of tag visualisation - which is probably the best description of it anyway.
Sandra
Reported by: orchard