Closed noedelta closed 8 years ago
Logged In: YES user_id=653048 Originator: NO
see request 1467868, this was discussed at the san francisco PSI meeting. Decision was that although redundant CV terms should allow both representations. Each individual database or user could the choose their favorite one.
Original comment by: luisa_montecchi
Logged In: YES user_id=653048 Originator: NO
see request 1467868, this was discussed at the san francisco PSI meeting. Decision was that although redundant CV terms should allow both representations. Each individual database or user could the choose their favorite one.
Original comment by: luisa_montecchi
Logged In: YES user_id=1107300 Originator: YES
Thanks for explaination. The term itself needs to be corrected from lexa b52 complementation to lexa b42 complementation
Original comment by: jyotikhadake
Logged In: YES user_id=653048 Originator: NO
MI:0916 for new term
Original comment by: luisa_montecchi
Original comment by: luisa_montecchi
is_a experimental interaction detection is_a complementation assay is_a transcriptional complementation assay is_a two hybrid is_a lexa b52 complementation is_a gal4 vp16 complementation
We have lexa and b42 as tags is there a reason why this term has been introduced specifically? Is the usage in any way different from a normal two hybrid with lexa and b42 fusion protein tags?
Reported by: jyotikhadake