would it be possible to come up with a common scheme for annotating
binary interactions reported by the authors in a way that makes them
distinct from interactions identified in a single pull-down
experiment
maybe directly annotating primary experiments to label them as they are with a term:
primary experiment
and child terms:
binary interaction detected
binary interaction assumed by database with spoke model applied to heterogeneous affinity complex
binary interaction assumed by database with matrix model applied to heterogeneous affinity complex
binary interaction assumed by author applied to heterogeneous affinity complex
would it be possible to come up with a common scheme for annotating binary interactions reported by the authors in a way that makes them distinct from interactions identified in a single pull-down experiment
maybe directly annotating primary experiments to label them as they are with a term: primary experiment
and child terms: binary interaction detected binary interaction assumed by database with spoke model applied to heterogeneous affinity complex binary interaction assumed by database with matrix model applied to heterogeneous affinity complex binary interaction assumed by author applied to heterogeneous affinity complex
Reported by: orchard