Closed lukasz99 closed 4 years ago
We have 'subset' (MI:2179, synonym 'part of'), defined as 'Reference to the corresponding object in another database. It implies the object is part of a cross-referenced entity (usually a complex).'
Would this do? I would say it fits.
On 10/28/19 9:58 AM, Pablo Porras wrote:
We have 'subset' (MI:2179, synonym 'part of'), defined as 'Reference to the corresponding object in another database. It implies the object is part of a cross-referenced entity (usually a complex).'
Would this do? I would say it fits.
which way does it go ? is the referenced object 'part of' the one that the xref is hanging off or does it go the other way ? is the pdb part of the interaction or is the interaction part of pdb ?
lukasz
The pdb is part of the interaction: the xref would hang on an interaction/complex and refer to a PDB entry that represents part of it. We have been using it on the Complex Portal, here's an example: https://www.ebi.ac.uk/complexportal/complex/CPX-152. Go to the structures section and click through the different structures to see how they only represent part of the complex.
On 10/28/19 10:31 AM, Pablo Porras wrote:
The pdb is part of the interaction: the xref would hang on an interaction/complex and refer to a PDB entry that represents part of it. We have been using it on the Complex Portal, here's an example: https://www.ebi.ac.uk/complexportal/complex/CPX-152. Go to the structures section and click through the different structures to see how they only represent part of the complex.
so, I'd guess. then it's ok. lukasz
OK, closing the issue, then.
Hello, a relatively recent cryo-EM technique called focused refinement (see, eg PMID: 29856314, https://elifesciences.org/articles/36861) results in structures reported as collections of PDB files - one (or more) of them models entire complex but a number of additional ones correspond to individually refined (but otherwise not autonomous) subfragments. All of these should be entered as cross-references but 'identity' as cross-reference type does not seem particularly appropriate - the structures do not exist on their own but correspond to fragments of bigger structures.
So what about adding a new 'complex fragment' cross-reference type to use in such cases ?
it would be used for pdbs that do not correspond to complete complexes.