Open yuki0410-dev opened 1 week ago
All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:
Project coverage is 96.67%. Comparing base (
f90932c
) to head (c86a0e8
).
:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.
However, changing from yarn to npm is a fairly significant change to be occurring without previous consensus on doing so.
I agree. I created the PR as a suggestion, hoping that you would be able to judge from the specific changes!
Personally, I don't see the need for it, particularly as there is a workaround that is already being used.
There are some PACKAGES that cannot be deleted due to the use of YARN. https://github.com/Hacker0x01/react-datepicker/pull/4896
I have not had any problems at all with npm.
However this decision is up to the HackerOne team.
I think you are right.
@martijnrusschen What do you think about this change? We are willing to resolve conflicts if the policy seems acceptable.
Description: I suggest moving from yarn to npm.
Linked issue: -
Problem
Changes
Contribution checklist