Open OBITORASU opened 3 years ago
We are using instagram.py in auto.sh script whereas instagram-py is in use for manual.sh. Referring to the original usage of instagram-py here:
instagram.py
auto.sh
instagram-py
manual.sh
usage: instagram-py [-h] [--username USERNAME] [--password-list PASSWORD_LIST] [--script SCRIPT] [--inspect-username INSPECT_USERNAME] [--create-configuration] [--default-configuration] [--countinue] [--verbose] optional arguments: -h, --help show this help message and exit --username USERNAME, -u USERNAME username for Instagram account --password-list PASSWORD_LIST, -pl PASSWORD_LIST password list file to try with the given username. --script SCRIPT, -s SCRIPT Instagram-Py Attack Script. --inspect-username INSPECT_USERNAME, -i INSPECT_USERNAME Username to inspect in the instagram-py dump. --create-configuration, -cc Create a Configuration file for Instagram-Py with ease. --default-configuration, -dc noconfirm for Instagram-Py Configuration Creator! --countinue, -c Countinue the previous attack if found. --verbose, -v Activate Verbose mode. ( Verbose level ) example: instagram-py -c -vvv -u instatestgod__ -pl rockyou.txt
Revert to using instagram-py in auto.sh should be the idea here I think. That would remove the discrepancy between the commands in the two scripts.
Do share your feedback on this issue and correct me if I am wrong with this catch.
Description
We are using
instagram.py
inauto.sh
script whereasinstagram-py
is in use formanual.sh
. Referring to the original usage of instagram-py here:Solution
Revert to using
instagram-py
inauto.sh
should be the idea here I think. That would remove the discrepancy between the commands in the two scripts.Do share your feedback on this issue and correct me if I am wrong with this catch.