Closed mi-les closed 1 year ago
Hi Michaela, Thanx for the notice. I'll look into it immediately. Best, Hajo
I think I've found it: your error message gives a line number, 42642, that points to the first (of three) changes of authorLists of literature sources:
42641
In the past I did not have any rdf:Description in OM, so I think for some reason something goes wrong there. For now I'll comment such lines out. I'll give you a sign when I have done that (I'll do that immediately). Subsequently I will look for a more sustainable solution. I will keep you updated about that.
I have commented the lines out and uploaded a new version of om-2.0.rdf. Can you check if this one is parsing correctly? Thanx in advance. Sorry for any inconvenience!
Yep, that was it, works now! Thanks for the super quick response.
Thanx for your testing and quick response too! Hope to get back to this soon with an altered definition of the authorList entries.
No problem Jan Martin, thanx for your (quick) help! :) So do I understand correctly that the use of rdf:Description was not the problem, but the use of rdf:resource after that rather than rdf:about? Anyway, I have merged your pull request, and Michaela if you could try parsing this new version of OM again, that would be great! :) Thanx in advance!
I also often use Protégé for testing. ;)
it's working :) thanks again!
Great! Thanx! :)
Hi,
after the recent changes, I cannot parse the om-2.0.rdf file using
rdflib
anymore, like so:This throws the following error:
It worked just fine before the weekend. Anything gone wrong in the recent merges?