Hamed9Ariyan / Dark-NASA

BSD 3-Clause "New" or "Revised" License
1 stars 1 forks source link

Dark NASA #1

Closed Hamed9Ariyan closed 2 years ago

Hamed9Ariyan commented 2 years ago

Possible Implications of Asymmetric Fermionic Dark Matter for Neutron Stars I. Goldmana , R. N. Mohapatrab , S. Nussinovc,d, D. Rosenbaume and V. Teplitze,f aDepartment of Exact Sciences, Afeka Tel Aviv Academic Engineering College, Tel Aviv, Israel bMaryland Center for Fundamental Physics and Department of Physics, University of Maryland, College Park, USA cSchool of Physics and Astronomy, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel dSchmid College of Science,Chapman University, Orange, California 92866, USA e Physics Department, Southern Methodist University, Dallas and fNASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD, USA Abstract We consider the implications of fermionic asymmetric dark matter (ADM) for a “mixed neu￾tron star” composed of ordinary baryons and dark fermions. We find examples, where for a certain range of dark fermion mass – when it is less than that of ordinary baryons – such sys￾tems can reach higher masses than the maximal values allowed for ordinary (“pure”) neutron stars. This is shown both within a simplified, heuristic Newtonian analytic framework with non-interacting particles and via a general relativistic numerical calculation, under certain as￾sumptions for the dark matter equation of state. Our work applies to various dark fermion models such as mirror matter models and to other models where the dark fermions have self interactions.

Hamed9Ariyan commented 2 years ago

I. INTRODUCTION Cold dark matter (CDM), favored by most astrophysical and cosmological observations, can be realized in symmetric or asymmetric scenarios. In the first class of models, dark matter is made of stable X particles and an equal amount of stable X¯ antiparticles of mass mX. In the early universe, these were in thermal equilibrium and their residual abundance ΩX is fixed, at the “freeze-out” value, when the rate of the Hubble expansion overcomes that of X¯  X annihilation. A prototypical example, which has been extensively studied, is provided by supersymmetric models with R-parity conservation, where the lightest superpartner is stable and plays the role of the dark matter of the universe. As yet no light sub-TeV SUSY partners have been discovered at the LHC, and searches for electrons, positrons or photons from annihilations in clumps of DM in and around our Galaxy, do not provide solid “indirect” evidence for symmetric massive DM. Moreover, the ongoing direct underground searches put very strong bounds on the scattering cross sections of massive X’s on nuclei. In the symmetric case, accretion of DM particles onto the sun accelerates the rate of particle-antiparticle annihilation. The resulting photons, electrons, etc., are all trapped in the star. However, for massive DM particles, looking in ICE-CUBE (the large km3 Cerenkov radiation detector near the south-pole) for the resulting UHE neutrinos is an excellent indirect detection method. The fact that no such energetic neutrinos have been detected constrains symmetric DM models. Consequently there has been, in recent years, a renewed interest in a second class of models: the asymmetric dark matter (ADM) models. In such models, the relic ADM density is determined in a manner analogous to that of ordinary baryonic matter, not by the freeze-out of DM annihilation, as in the symmetric case. An excess of dark fermions (over the antifermions) remains after the annihilation of most antiparticles. The required dark matter density in such models is readily achieved if the ratio of the ADM particles mass and that of ordinary baryons is tuned inversely with the corresponding ratio of asymmetries. Many examples of such models have been proposed over the years [1]. Here we consider variants in which the dark matter particle is rather light with mass in the sub- GeV range. Scattering of such light CDM on most detector materials yields

Hamed9Ariyan commented 2 years ago

0.1 KeV which are below the existing experimental thresholds. Hence the present upper bounds on the X-N scattering cross-sections do not apply. Also the stringent indirect upper bounds from missing energy searches at the collider [2] apply for massive mediators of the X-nucleon interactions - and do not apply if the exchange of a relatively light ”dark photon” mediates X-N scattering, as is the case in several asymmetric dark matter models. This may allow σXX N of order 10034 cm2 – which is high enough to be relevant in astrophysical settings and yet is 10 orders of magnitude smaller than the intra- species cross-sections of ordinary matter and potentially of dark matter. For our purpose, in this paper, it is useful to consider a class of models for ADM proposed in [3] and its possible variants. These contain an additional sector mir￾roring our universe. The mirror sector consists of particles and forces related to those of the familiar standard model by a mirror symmetry. As a result, there are no new param￾eters in the model prior to gauge symmetry breaking [4]. In generic mirror models, an important constraint comes from BBN due to the presence of three extra neutrinos and an extra photon. One way to avoid this constraint is to to assume that the temperature of the mirror sector is smaller than that of the familiar sector [5]. An alternative possibility detailed in [3] is to have the symmetry breaking in the mirror sector sufficiently different from that in the familiar sector so that all the mirror neutrinos and mirror photon are heavy and have decayed by the BBN epoch and only the mirror neutrons survive con￾stituting the dark matter. Our considerations are independent of the model details of [3] and could be applied to variants of the model where the mirror photon is very light, e.g. less than an eV. The details of large scale structure formation depend on the specific model for the asymmetric dark matter. Being self interacting the dark matter will no longer provide collision-less dark halos with many possible cosmological ramifications [6]. In asymmetric DM models, the dark matter particles can accumulate in as￾trophysical objects and alter their properties. The goal of the present paper is to study the effect of such accumulation on neutron star properties. Similar studies for the case of scalar ADM have been reported in several papers [7], where Bose condensation plays an important role. The situation for the case of fermionic dark matter is however very different due to the Pauli exclusion principle and our goal is to make some remarks on this

Hamed9Ariyan commented 2 years ago

We find that under certain conditions, the mass of the mixed neutron- DM star can exceed the Chandrasekhar-like mass limit for ordinary neutron stars. The recent discovery of a 2M binary radio pulsar [8], already severely constrains nuclear matter equations of state, if it is a “pure” neutron star and possible future observation of such neutron stars with higher masses would be very difficult to reconcile with standard hadronic physics but, as we show in this paper, such higher mass neutron stars seem to be more easily realized as mixed neutron stars. Another result of our discussion is that, for a mixed neutron star with two species which interact with each other only via gravitational interactions, requiring sta￾bility (see sec. 4) imposes an interesting scaling relation between the number and energy density and pressure. Such a relation will constrain the density profiles of the model as well as the number distribution of the two species. This paper is organized as follows: in sec. II, we discuss a Newtonian model for a mixed neutron star; in sec. III, we present the general relativistic treatment of the mixed neutron star containing both ordinary and dark fermions. In sec. IV, we discuss the implications of stability (extremum with respect to variations of mass-energy density keeping the total number of particles fixed) for the mixed neutron star; see Eq. (38). We find the interesting relation cited above among pressure, density and the particle number density in the two sectors. In sec. V, we present an illustrative example where we employ the same equation of state for the familiar sector and the dark sector to discuss the impact on neutron star mass. In sec. VI, we present some astrophysical discussion and we conclude in sec. VII.