As far as I understand it is only possible to select the probe starting position in STEM/PACBED simulations and not the stop position? This option would be nice for e.g. simulating precipitates embedded in a matrix so that the tiling could be included in the .xtl-file. This would be less computationally heavy, since if one was to do the tiling in MuSTEM and on the same time account for wrap-around error, one would need a larger supercell than if one could account for both the tiling and the wrap-around error in the model itself.
As far as I understand it is only possible to select the probe starting position in STEM/PACBED simulations and not the stop position? This option would be nice for e.g. simulating precipitates embedded in a matrix so that the tiling could be included in the .xtl-file. This would be less computationally heavy, since if one was to do the tiling in MuSTEM and on the same time account for wrap-around error, one would need a larger supercell than if one could account for both the tiling and the wrap-around error in the model itself.