Haomeng / signavio-core-components

Automatically exported from code.google.com/p/signavio-core-components
GNU General Public License v3.0
0 stars 0 forks source link

Multiple lines with tags <signal name="signal1"/> #45

Open GoogleCodeExporter opened 8 years ago

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago
-What steps will reproduce the problem?
1. In BPMN diagram/process create two or more signal events.
2. Define them same THE SAME Signalname.
3. One intermediate catching event. Others with the sames Signalname's - 
throwing events. 

-What is the expected output? 
   <signal id="sid-45968cfc-0105-465d-837c-0ff504225c78" name="Signal1"/>
   <process id="Proc21" isExecutable="false">
      ....
      <intermediateCatchEvent ...>
         ...
         <signalEventDefinition id="sid-d24d56a2-b5dd-44ef-8687-8c2b6925df2e" signalRef="sid-45968cfc-0105-465d-837c-0ff504225c78"/>
      </intermediateCatchEvent>
      ...
      <boundaryEvent ... >
         ...
         <signalEventDefinition id="sid-b7d506f1-1fa0-45e0-b379-62095dc41f62" signalRef="sid-45968cfc-0105-465d-837c-0ff504225c78"/>
      </boundaryEvent>
   </process >

-What do you see instead?
   <signal id="sid-45968cfc-0105-465d-837c-0ff504225c78" name="Signal1"/>
   <signal id="sid-270e32d3-ee90-4a34-a5a0-57a271819962" name="Signal1"/>
   <process id="Proc21" isExecutable="false">
      ....
      <intermediateCatchEvent ...>
         ...
         <signalEventDefinition id="sid-d24d56a2-b5dd-44ef-8687-8c2b6925df2e" signalRef="sid-45968cfc-0105-465d-837c-0ff504225c78"/>
      </intermediateCatchEvent>
      ...
      <boundaryEvent ... >
         ...
         <signalEventDefinition id="sid-b7d506f1-1fa0-45e0-b379-62095dc41f62" signalRef="sid-270e32d3-ee90-4a34-a5a0-57a271819962"/>
      </boundaryEvent>
   </process >

-What version of the product are you using? On what operating system?
last trunk

-Please provide any additional information below.
As I understand Signal names should be unique in processes deployment. How to 
solve these problems.

Original issue reported on code.google.com by Mindauga...@gmail.com on 3 Aug 2012 at 5:37