Closed ghost closed 5 years ago
Hi @ankursethi-uscis thanks for your message,
I work on a new version Release 1.0.0 which build on the new cf v3 api. With the usage of ne "newest" api we have the possibility to bring the feature you want.
I have to think about how I will bring that feature if it's the "default" or a special command to say which service should be bind lazy before we switch the route.
Kind regards
Hi @ankursethi-uscis,
so i think a little bit about the feature and i will bring it in one of the next release version of puppeteer. I think i will bring 2 new arguments. --no-routes --routes-only
With the arguments it should be very easy to do everything you need between the deployments, and it should be very easy to automate these in you ci.
What do you think about?
Kind regards
This is really nice! The --routes-only
will expect an app with name -venerable
.
Currently we push even our background apps which don't have a route with the zero-downtime push. So maybe the --routes-only
can also push with --no-start
for apps without a route.
Also for apps with a route with --routes-only
we would like to add --no-start
. So maybe this can be added as well?
Hi @ankursethi-uscis the new version is released. Please read the new blog post on the website to get some more informations.
I‘m happy to get some feedback.
@HappyTobi This is awesome. I am looking through the documentation now. I am confused about the example here: https://cf-puppeteer.happytobi.com/posts/release_1.1.0/
In the no-routes section it only mentions vendor-option but it doesn't use "no-routes". And in the section below it says:
no-routes option added - ignore route switching, should be combined with vendor-option
I am not clear what vendor-option
does and why it is necessary. But this work is great!
Thx for the feedback i think if have to document the option a bit more. The vendor-option is for stop, delete or do nothing with the renamed Application. (The old one AppName-ven )
I will update the blog and the documentation
Oh the confusion is for venerable
. Venerable means respectable or old. Vendor means supplier.
venerable
is long but you can't use vendor
.
venerable-action
will be the best and clear
Also will venerable-action
be necessary for --no-routes
? Maybe a default of none
for venerable-action
can be applied when using --no-routes
. That way only --no-routes
is necessary for the common use case.
Thx for the Import, i think i will change it like that in the next version 1.2.0
Right now the default ist delete, and you don‘t have to use that it also work without the action command
Hi @ankursethi-uscis i released a new version where i changed the argument name and the route venerable combination. See the latest blog post
@HappyTobi Thanks this is great!
Are there any suggestions on how we can do something on a new app before the routes are switched?
The reason for this is we are using NFS on PCF. NFS services must be created and bound with a configuration so they cannot just be specified in the manifest.
Our current situation is running a zero-downtime push, then stopping the app, adding the NFS service via
cf service bind
with a configuration and restarting it. So it is an almost no downtime push.I think this would ideally happen in two stages. Have cf-puppeteer support a push without a remap. Do our binding and then call cf-puppeteer again to finish the route changes and cleanup. Of course the second step could be handled by us manually.