[e999aa4] Parameter matching generates errors, but works anyway

[Digital-Monk]

GHC 8.6.5, extopenscad 0.2.1, commit e999aa4.

The following line in my code: cube(size = [80, 33, 145], r = 2);

Generates the following on stderr:

Error at line 8, column 25: no instance of cube found to match given parameters.
Instances available:
Module cube[  (x=..., y=..., z=..., center) {},  (size=..., center) {} ]
Error at line 8, column 25: Insufficient parameters. Passed 2 named parameters. Couldn't match 3 parameters: "x", "y" and "z". Had 2 extra parameters. They are:"size" and "r".
Error at line 8, column 25: Too many parameters: 2 extra. Passed 2 named parameters. Couldn't match 3 parameters: "x", "y" and "z". Had 2 extra parameters. They are:"size" and "r".
Error at line 8, column 25: Too many parameters: 1 extra. Passed 2 named parameters. Had one extra parameter: "r"

Oddly enough, the model is built exactly as requested. This seems to be some extra pattern matcher that is out of sync with ImplicitCAD (I notice that r is never recognized as a valid parameter in these messages). I have noticed that if I don't use any named parameters and do specify all of the parameters, I don't get these "errors". For instance, cube([80, 33, 145], false, 2); doesn't cause any signature errors.

Regardless, the correct model is built, and the correct object is output.

[julialongtin]

Fixed, try the latest version. :)

[Digital-Monk]

Looks good! Thanks!