Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 8 years ago
Below is the error message that i get:
Exception in thread "main" java.lang.Exception: VMFS FSInfo block not found
at com.fluidops.tools.vmfs.VMFSDriver.readVmfsInfo(VMFSDriver.java:558)
at com.fluidops.tools.vmfs.VMFSDriver.openVmfs(VMFSDriver.java:793)
at com.fluidops.tools.vmfs.VMFSTools.cli(VMFSTools.java:165)
at com.fluidops.tools.vmfs.VMFSTools.main(VMFSTools.java:355)
Original comment by manasmu...@gmail.com
on 24 Mar 2009 at 8:03
If I understand it correctly, your VMFS spans two disk extents on two different
LUNs.
This is a known shortcoming: disk extents are not supported yet by the driver.
Original comment by fluidops...@gmail.com
on 26 Mar 2009 at 11:12
Hi Ulrich,
Yes, your understanding is correct. I have gone through the code also, and
figured
out that the driver does not support it currently.
But, It would be really kind of you if you could help me on this. I mean, if
you
could give me any information (some header info or meta data info) which could
help
me make changes in the code and solve the issue.
As the driver is open source, I have already put in some efforts in going
through the
code and am now stuck with this issue. Any information on the headers or the
manner
in which the data is stored in the second LUN , will be really helpful.
Thanks,
Manas
Original comment by manasmu...@gmail.com
on 26 Mar 2009 at 2:36
The LUNs are managed with a Logical Volume Manager (LVM).
A first test would be to check compatibility and mount the 2 LUNs as a logical
volume
from a reguar Linux system (using LVM tools). Then, the driver should be able
to work
on the resulting logical volume like /dev/volg1/logv1.
For further steps, the on disk format, and source code of LVM can be found here:
http://sources.redhat.com/lvm/
-- Thanks
Original comment by fluidops...@gmail.com
on 27 Mar 2009 at 10:40
VMFS LVM with multiple extents is supported in r95.
Original comment by fluidops...@gmail.com
on 26 Jan 2010 at 7:22
Original comment by fluidops...@gmail.com
on 26 Jan 2010 at 7:25
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
manasmu...@gmail.com
on 24 Mar 2009 at 7:48