Closed spengrah closed 1 year ago
@spengrah You've probably considered this, but maybe if the local tophat of the tree to be pruned isn't worn by an eligible user, the failsafe could be passing in a wearer of The Root Tophat and minting a local tophat to that address.
Just an idea for a secure way of eliminating that extra step. The increased complexity might not be worth it though.
This PR prevents linked tophats that have no wearer from being unlinked, plus a couple other small QoL additions.