Open troggnostupidhs opened 7 years ago
If you have no weapon and use Rogue's hero power, Orgrimmar Aspirant will not give your weapon +1 attack. I'm not sure whether these should be called bugs, for they're related to the mechanical changes in Patch 9.2. The mechanics now work like this: A trigger's ALL validities are checked at an earlier timing. But in my view, only its validity of position and controller shall be checked at this time.
https://youtu.be/vepI07VZE1Y?t=310
Potion of Polymorph interaction
https://playhearthstone.com/en-us/blog/21802981
Summon and Play triggers are now evaluated using their in-hand stats before they are affected by board modifiers and their Battlecry.
- Ex. Playing Faceless Manipulator targeting a 5-attack minion will no longer advance Jungle Giants. It will be considered a 3/3.
Minions that enter the battlefield without being played from hand will have any (Whenever or After) summon triggers evaluated before board modifiers are applied.
- Ex. If Azure Drake is pulled onto the battlefield adjacent to Dire Wolf Alpha it will no longer advance Jungle Giants.
Choose One minions that Transform now consider their transformation effects before entering play.
- Ex. Playing Shellshifter and selecting the 5/3 option will count as a 5-attack minion and advance Jungle Giants.
Can anyone test?
These are all correct? This can be closed?
Isn't 5. wrong or am I missing something?
I read Faceless, but didn't check the stats.
Summon and Play triggers are now evaluated using their in-hand stats before they are affected by board modifiers and their Battlecry. Ex. Playing Faceless Manipulator targeting a 5-attack minion will no longer advance Jungle Giants. It will be considered a 3/3.
5 does seem wrong.
5/5 Faceless 1/1. Jungle Giants is still 0/5.
Can anyone verify the 5/5 Faceless Manipulator behavior is still happening? Considering closing this and opening a separate post for that, if it is. The original issue behind this thread became the intended behavior. Meanwhile the new issue was intended behavior at the time this was posted, and now it is not. Seems confusing from an archival sense to have this post represent two separate and opposite issues across two points in time.
From #761