Definitions

[fameri]

work management processes don't have definitions.

[HediKarray]

We must respect the Aristotelian definitions principle: Any term 'A' asserted to have parent term 'B', should be defined as 'A= def. a B which C', where 'C' express some condition on those instances of B which fall within the A's.

[HediKarray]

I suggest coming back to maintenance action class. and maintenance task as subclass of it. I propose these definitions:

maintenance action is a process that includes one or more tasks capable to retain a maintainable item in or restoring it to a specific condition.

A maintenance task is an elementary maintenance action.

[fameri]

I agree with you Hedi. A Maintenance Action is a composed of one or more elementary Maintenance Tasks.

[fameri]

also we need to make sure to use 'definition' instead of 'isDefinedB' annotation property for all definitions.

[HediKarray]

i added an annotation property "definition" we need to update it for all classes. Also, add definition of bfo classes

[mhodki]

When I go + on annotations I do not see a definition option only an isDefinedBy option. I am using the ROMAIN Instanciated version

[HediKarray]

My students are until now autonomous, they are programming without asking lot of questions. :)

Le 16 mai 2018 à 07:36, Melinda Hodkiewicz notifications@github.com a écrit :

When I go + on annotations I do not see a definition option only an isDefinedBy option

— You are receiving this because you commented. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/HediKarray/COMAIN_ROMAIN/issues/2#issuecomment-389400145, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AYXXLZEQJBsQKSvrgTsir2B0UXpBCG3Vks5ty7rmgaJpZM4T_7gs.

[mhodki]

What goes in the Reasoning section 6.1 and 6.3 Possible and impossible extensions

From: HediKarray [mailto:notifications@github.com] Sent: Wednesday, 16 May 2018 2:47 PM To: HediKarray/COMAIN_ROMAIN COMAIN_ROMAIN@noreply.github.com Cc: Melinda Hodkiewicz melinda.hodkiewicz@uwa.edu.au; Comment comment@noreply.github.com Subject: Re: [HediKarray/COMAIN_ROMAIN] Definitions (#2)

My students are until now autonomous, they are programming without asking lot of questions. :)

Le 16 mai 2018 à 07:36, Melinda Hodkiewicz notifications@github.com<mailto:notifications@github.com> a écrit :

When I go + on annotations I do not see a definition option only an isDefinedBy option

— You are receiving this because you commented. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/HediKarray/COMAIN_ROMAIN/issues/2#issuecomment-389400145, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AYXXLZEQJBsQKSvrgTsir2B0UXpBCG3Vks5ty7rmgaJpZM4T_7gs.

— You are receiving this because you commented. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/HediKarray/COMAIN_ROMAIN/issues/2#issuecomment-389412847, or mute the threadhttps://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AMcN98rFKTa68cCD4_jFZRtPRrdBRaMVks5ty8tcgaJpZM4T_7gs.

[tlouge]

Do we need to explain (a little, main concepts/relations) in the reasoning section how do we use the ontology to answer the competency questions? I think yes, but just to be sure... Edit: Melinda Answered.

[mhodki]

I agree. Can you write something?

Sent from my IPhone

On 16 May 2018, at 17:22, tlouge notifications@github.com<mailto:notifications@github.com> wrote:

Do we need to explain (a little, main concepts/relations) in the reasoning section how do we use the ontology to answer the competency questions? I think yes, but just to be sure...

— You are receiving this because you commented. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/HediKarray/COMAIN_ROMAIN/issues/2#issuecomment-389454175, or mute the threadhttps://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AMcN94wN7MEQ8-vaJK0o8-CZB0MSS7xWks5ty-_agaJpZM4T_7gs.