Closed westonganger closed 1 year ago
Thanks for another issue raised!
I've now added platform support towards the top of the Taylor website
and I have also updated the Cheat Sheet and Getting Started pages, although I wasn't really sure what to add to the Getting Started page I did notice some weird grammar towards the end that I have updated.
The web functionality of this library is one of its biggest selling features however its hardly mentioned
On Reddit I am starting to see the taylor name come up more and more often. It would be huge to have the web/wasm support be marketed.
Other competitors status in the ruby/web/wasm space:
If we advocate for Taylor Web/WASM support than that puts Taylor at the top of the pile, being that its both open source and has web/wasm support with mruby.
Suggested actions
Mention web/wasm (and other platforms) near top of taylor Github readme.
Mention web/wasm on taylor home page, https://taylor.oequacki.com/
Mention web/wasm here on taylor getting started page, https://taylor.oequacki.com/documentation/tutorials/getting_started/
Add web/browser section on the cheatsheet, https://taylor.oequacki.com/documentation/tutorials/cheat_sheet/