Open PSLLSP opened 11 months ago
Hello, I'm not sure that I understand. What is the problem or question here?
Script reports wrong result on i386. You can take it as a joke and ignore it... ;-) Or improve detection of CPU architecture. There was a question in the script and this is the answer.
Sorry, still can't read your mind ;p ... what should the proper answer be? (I'm by no means an expert on x86-64 microarchitectures...)
Okay, I'm slow - the i386 architecture predates the x86-64 microarchitecture.
Jokes aside, how should x86-64-level
handle this? For instance, if x86-64-v1 is not fulfilled, can we say anything intelligent about the default "x86-64-v0" level? May the --verbose
message could say:
$ x86-64-level --verbose
Identified x86-64-v0(*), because x86-64-v1 requires 'lm', which is not supported by this CPU [Intel(R)
Atom(TM) CPU N280 @ 1.66GHz]. (*) Does this CPU implement x86-64 microarchitecture?
0
Question in the scipt
Yes, it can happen: