Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 8 years ago
With the changes I have made to the sending system in my current build this
would be pretty simple to implement actually. I'm a little curious as to why
you need a separate system for auditing and operation though. Wouldn't they
both contain the same data?
Original comment by sherwin....@gmail.com
on 10 Mar 2011 at 6:36
Hi Sherwin,
Yes same data but different function with restricted access, kinda like a black
box flight recorder.
Do you recommend we adjust build 4.4.1 and recompile?
Best regards,
Mark
Original comment by markyjph...@gmail.com
on 11 Mar 2011 at 8:55
You can adjust that build for the short term. I will release a beta build in a
few weeks that will allow that support.
Original comment by sherwin....@gmail.com
on 14 Mar 2011 at 1:48
Original comment by sherwin....@gmail.com
on 16 Mar 2011 at 11:06
Hi Sherwin,
Is this feature available in this weekend build?
I've made a patch for this a few weeks ago but didn't submited to you because
you said you were changing network code. Maybe I can help you you with this
request.
Original comment by wired...@gmail.com
on 2 Apr 2011 at 10:52
Wired,
Yes I have included it in the updated code, but I did not get a chance to build
the executables this past weekend. The network code has also been changed quite
a bit so it won't match the previous revision at all. I am attempting to get
the new executables and any other bug fixes out this evening.
Thanks for your work though.
-Sherwin
Original comment by sherwin....@gmail.com
on 7 Apr 2011 at 11:23
Enabled. The fix will be included in the update tonight.
Note: hosts 3 and 4 can be set in the registry, or from the command line in the
backup loghost option (-b). Separate each host by a semicolon (;).
Ex: evtsys.exe -i -h syslog1 -b syslog2;syslog3...
Original comment by sherwin....@gmail.com
on 8 Apr 2011 at 12:37
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
markyjph...@gmail.com
on 9 Mar 2011 at 12:26