Ho-Ro
commented
4 years ago If your device uses one FX2 chip it should at least load the firmware and work - maybe with bogus values - but if it uses two FX2 chips (one for LA, the other for scope), you must be sure to address the right chip.
As a starting point you could use my test setup that works with a cheap saleae clone, that is more or less a FX2 devel board.
Uncomment this line: // #define LCSOFT_TEST_BOARD and plug in...
It is detected and works without any HW change, only the returned values are senseless.
https://github.com/OpenHantek/OpenHantek6022/blob/2ae596f8771e788f401f01eb06026ce6ad682180/openhantek/src/hantekdso/models/modelDSO6022.h#L33
// two test cases with simple EZUSB board (LCsoft) without EEPROM or with Saleae VID/PID in EEPROM
// after loading the FW they look like a 6022BE (without useful sample values as Port B and D are left open)
// LCSOFT_TEST_BOARD is also used in modelDSO6022.cpp
// #define LCSOFT_TEST_BOARD
#ifdef LCSOFT_TEST_BOARD
struct ModelEzUSB : public DSOModel {
static const int ID = 0x6022;
ModelEzUSB();
void applyRequirements(HantekDsoControl* dsoControl) const override;
};
struct ModelSaleae : public DSOModel {
static const int ID = 0x6022;
ModelSaleae();
void applyRequirements(HantekDsoControl* dsoControl) const override;
};
#endif
Deusex25
Hi guys. Recently I got my hands on a clone of USBee-DX device. This is combined logic analyzer and oscilloscope. I was hoping to make it working under Linux with Sigrok PulseView software, but unfortunately it supports only analyzer. Googling this issue brought me to few articles, with information, that this devices are hardware compatible to Saleae logic analysers and stating that Handek 6022 is basically improved clone of the same USBee-DX... Indeed, checking the drawings I've found, led me to conclusion that at least general configuration is very similar: both devices are using Cypress FX2 chip (100-pin CY7C68013A-100 in case of Hantek and 56-pin Cypress CY7C68013A-56 in case of USBee-DX clone), which is getting information from ADCs (one dual ADC AD9288 and two single TLC5510 respectively) over B and D ports, and both devices are getting the firmware from PC software.
Winged by this information I started experimenting with different VID/PID values, trying to get USBee-DX clone represent itself as 6022, and even got it detected as Hantek and driver loaded. Unfortunately OpenHantek software shows an error, stating that it cannot load the firmware.
My question is: will it be possible to get a support for USBee-DX compatible oscilloscopes? What can I do from my side? I'm programming a bit (C & C++), but I'm not professional. I do not know, from which side to approach to this issue.