Closed Alizter closed 1 month ago
Turns out we don't get definitionally involutive associators and unitors since we are taking inverses there. I have updated the tests to show the current state of the opposite involutions. This isn't strictly needed for #1929 anyway.
LGTM.
Carry out the suggestion in #1961. This will allow for more of the data of a monoidal category or (2,1)-category to be definitionally involutive.