Closed Alizter closed 1 month ago
I can't remember my reasoning now so it probably wasn't very good. I think I may have confused myself about where the commutativity lemma was and perhaps thought it was in Arithmetic. I've updated the proof to use commutativity now.
This is a simple lemma that comes in useful later. We could probably give a shorter proof with commutativity of nat addition, but I would prefer to keep this earlier on.