Closed FernandoChu closed 1 year ago
Thanks for this!
I wonder whether the derivation of $g \circ f \sim \mathsf{id}$ from the uniqueness principle could stand more explanation? In particular, regarding exactly why we get a $q$ of the dependent identity type mentioned in the uniqueness principle?
Sorry for the delay (github didn't ping me it seems), and thanks for the comments. I've expanded on the suggested point.
I don't think the failing check is because of my changes.
Solves https://github.com/HoTT/book/issues/1123 by defining the quasi-inverses.