Open mikeshulman opened 11 years ago
I think the closest the book comes is in the introduction:
The present book is intended as a first systematic exposition of the basics of univalent foundations, and a collection of examples of this new style of reasoning but without requiring the reader to know or learn any formal logic, or to use any computer proof assistant.
I've had two questions so far about the prerequisites / expected background to read the book. Do we address this anywhere in the book?