Before, we sometimes used 8-bit indices and sometimes 16-bit ones,
because the reverse-engineered format documentation described it that
way.
However, these does not seem to be a good reason why there should be
16-bit color indices when the value it contains is just 8-bit. It's
likely that the most significant byte actually belongs to another field.
Before, we sometimes used 8-bit indices and sometimes 16-bit ones, because the reverse-engineered format documentation described it that way.
However, these does not seem to be a good reason why there should be 16-bit color indices when the value it contains is just 8-bit. It's likely that the most significant byte actually belongs to another field.
Also see:
https://github.com/Deep-Symmetry/crate-digger/issues/27