various: migrate remaining casks

[razvanazamfirei]

Important: Do not tick a checkbox if you haven’t performed its action. Honesty is indispensable for a smooth review process.

In the following questions <cask> is the token of the cask you're submitting.

After making any changes to a cask, existing or new, verify:

• [ ] The submission is for a stable version or documented exception.
• [ ] brew audit --cask --online <cask> is error-free.
• [ ] brew style --fix <cask> reports no offenses.

Additionally, if adding a new cask:

• [ ] Named the cask according to the token reference.
• [ ] Checked the cask was not already refused.
• [ ] Checked the cask is submitted to the correct repo.
• [ ] brew audit --new-cask <cask> worked successfully.
• [ ] brew install --cask <cask> worked successfully.
• [ ] brew uninstall --cask <cask> worked successfully.

[razvanazamfirei]

How do we fix CI syntax issues when there are no casks left?

[reitermarkus]

I guess just delete the CI workflow, since it won't be needed anymore.

[reitermarkus]

Or fix the error it in brew audit.

[bevanjkay]

@reitermarkus I have tried removing the CI workflow, because it won't run against any files anymore. We still wont be able to merge unless someone with permission turns off the required "conclusion" step.

[reitermarkus]

We'll need to keep the worfklow, actually, but remove everything except the conclusion task.

[bevanjkay]

@reitermarkus Do you mean removing the status check, or removing the task from the workflow?

[reitermarkus]

I meant removing the task from the workflow, but we can of course also remove the required status check instead.

[reitermarkus]

Needs a rebase.

[razvanazamfirei]

All done, @reitermarkus!