This output shows that an instance's ->class is somehow set t the same pointer (ending in 340) and so when it copies that value over, it ends up causing a problem for itself.
Now, strictly speaking, if an object is pointing at itself when we visit it, we shouldn't copy it -- so more than one thing is going wrong here..?
This output shows that an instance's ->class is somehow set t the same pointer (ending in 340) and so when it copies that value over, it ends up causing a problem for itself.
Now, strictly speaking, if an object is pointing at itself when we visit it, we shouldn't copy it -- so more than one thing is going wrong here..?