Open eclee25 opened 1 year ago
Model run:
HASH: 6772ea9da4f43ddc3da11c494a573af2ca3dd3c8
Convergence, fits, Rhats, and match to GAM input all look pretty good. Seems like there may be some small sfrac cells around the Northeast and Western borders
Opinion: Investigate border sfracs before approving
Agree with @eclee25
Opinion: Temp Approve and rerun with higher sfrac_thresh_border and same sfrac_thresh_conn after PR 475 is merged.
Model run (idm2):
HASH: 211913e0eb7d570ed62c48bc1ae9ecd6671a6cbc
Observations have conflicted number of cases for 2011, 2012, and 2013. Others look good.
Suggestion: double check those OCs in Table 6.
Opinion: Audit OC 129 as the data for 2011-13 seems suspect (Table 6 in cdr) and then rerun.
Audited OC 129 (cases were actually the precipitation in the source doc).
Rerun on dev:
HASH: 95a46cedc8aec45d530a29e658278ef9321234a9
All diag look good in post-audit report. Approve
Sep 2023 production run: all OK except for few observations with Rhat above thresh (2%), all below 1.08.
Suggestion: accept.
Approve
Data pull: HASH:
6772ea9da4f43ddc3da11c494a573af2ca3dd3c8
config