The expected behavior for transactions that calculate the transaction fee based on transaction size is to use a rate of 1sat/byte. This is the case for any transparent transactions created using e.g. sendtoaddress or sendmany.
In case of sc_create I encountered a transaction fee rate of ~1.289sat/byte.
Is setting a slightly higher fee rate the intended behavior or do we have an issue with the size estimation/calculation of sc_create transactions?
Note: I haven't checked other SC related MC transactions for fee behavior yet.
Sidechain creation tx, single 1.0001 ZEN vin, 1.00009023 ZEN FT, exact spend with no change, fee of 977sat. Transaction size was 758 bytes:
The expected behavior for transactions that calculate the transaction fee based on transaction size is to use a rate of 1sat/byte. This is the case for any transparent transactions created using e.g.
sendtoaddress
orsendmany
.In case of
sc_create
I encountered a transaction fee rate of ~1.289sat/byte.Is setting a slightly higher fee rate the intended behavior or do we have an issue with the size estimation/calculation of sc_create transactions?
Note: I haven't checked other SC related MC transactions for fee behavior yet.
Sidechain creation tx, single 1.0001 ZEN vin, 1.00009023 ZEN FT, exact spend with no change, fee of 977sat. Transaction size was 758 bytes: