In the v1, a keypoint-aware occlusion augmentation(shorten as OA in the following) is proposed, while in the v2, there is no place for that. But when I compare table 1 in v1 and the table 2 in v2, the result is consistent.
After reading the source code of AID in mmpose pull request, I failed to find anything related to OA.
Why do you drop OA? Does that indicate that using CutOut and HaS can get the same result as OA does?
In the v1, a keypoint-aware occlusion augmentation(shorten as
OA
in the following) is proposed, while in the v2, there is no place for that. But when I compare table 1 in v1 and the table 2 in v2, the result is consistent. After reading the source code of AID in mmpose pull request, I failed to find anything related to OA. Why do you drop OA? Does that indicate that usingCutOut
andHaS
can get the same result asOA
does?