search

Huggenguggen / pe

0 stars 0 forks source link

view behavior not consistent with UG #11

Open Huggenguggen opened 1 year ago

Huggenguggen commented 1 year ago

Steps to recreate: view 1 2

Again, this does not comply with the UG where it states that when a parameter is expected once, it will take the last instance of the parameter.

image.png

soc-pe-bot commented 1 year ago

Team's Response

Accepted, but this should be a DocumentationBug. For our documentation, we were referring to the "parameters" of a role when we mentioned that "when a parameter is expected once, it will take the last instance of the parameter". We were not referring to the general "parameters" of a command.

Items for the Tester to Verify

:question: Issue type

Team chose [type.DocumentationBug] Originally [type.FunctionalityBug]

Reason for disagreement: While you could differentiate between the "parameters" of a role vs the "parameters" of a command, I would find that pedantic and not intuitive as a user. As such, I still section this under a Functionality Bug. Going by the textbook,

image.png

I also think this qualifies as a Functionality Bug. As a developer myself, it should be possible to implement and accommodate the multiple parameter issue in commands like view.