search

Huggenguggen / pe

0 stars 0 forks source link

sorting by deadline behavior not consistent with UG #7

Open Huggenguggen opened 1 year ago

Huggenguggen commented 1 year ago

Steps to recreate: deadline asc desc

image.png

Expected behavior: deadline is sorted by descending order as UG has specified that when parameter is expected once, it should take the last instance of it.

image.png

nus-se-bot commented 1 year ago

Team's Response

Accepted, but it should be a documentation bug instead. We did not mention that this logic should only apply to add and edit commands, and not the deadline command.

Items for the Tester to Verify

:question: Issue type

Team chose [type.DocumentationBug] Originally [type.FunctionalityBug]

Reason for disagreement: While you could mention that this logic should only apply to add and edit commands, I would find that pedantic and not intuitive as a user. As such, I still section this under a Functionality Bug. Going by the textbook,

image.png

I also think this qualifies as a Functionality Bug. As a developer myself, it should be possible to implement and accommodate the multiple parameter issue in commands like sort, delete and edit.