Open GoogleCodeExporter opened 9 years ago
Person emails have to be required since they are unique identifiers for people.
Making up an "email" is reasonably OK since it then becomes an identifier
rather than an email address. Unfortunately Simal doesn't know the difference.
A possible enhancement to cover this situation would be to require an
identifier which, by default, is an email address (where one is supplied) or is
generated to be unique if no email is provided.
However, this breaks the duplication detection on people which is done by email
address.
No perfect solution is immediately obvious to me.
Original comment by ross.gardler
on 16 Nov 2010 at 1:13
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
ste...@fullmeasure.co.uk
on 16 Nov 2010 at 1:06