HugoBlox / hugo-blox-builder

🚨 GROW YOUR AUDIENCE WITH HUGOBLOX! 🚀 HugoBlox is an easy, fast no-code website builder for researchers, entrepreneurs, data scientists, and developers. Build stunning sites in minutes. 适合研究人员、企业家、数据科学家和开发者的简单快速无代码网站构建器。用拖放功能、可定制模板和内置SEO工具快速创建精美网站!
https://hugoblox.com/templates/
MIT License
8.2k stars 2.9k forks source link

Classic typography vs. true classic #469

Closed HughP closed 6 years ago

HughP commented 6 years ago

Greetings, I am just now upgrading from about a year of non-upgrades. I really like the work that has been done. I just notice one little thing which does not seem to be consistent with #289 : There is an option for typography: "default", "classic", "playfair". I notice that when "classic" is chosen that the sub-title of sections on the main page appear in a serif-ed font. It use to be a san-sarif font. The same as the section title, but just a little smaller in size. It would be nice to have the san-sarif option back.

New new

Old old

gcushen commented 6 years ago

Since the previous version of Academic that you were using, a theme system was introduced. The theme system standardises the style in this way so that different font and color themes can be easily applied.

You can customize fonts or override the subtitle font using custom CSS if you wish. Please use the discussion forum for any further support.

HughP commented 6 years ago

@gcushen I think your missing what I'm saying... I'm not asking for support on this issue. I'm reporting a bug. It looks like per #289 that the objective with the classic style was to replicate this theme's previous and older typographical choice. This part was missed, and therefore seems to be a bug "in the new 'classic' implementation".