RKalsch
commented
5 years ago -DataDocument: brut eau de toilette original ---is weird. There are only 5 ingredients, but multiple functions for each ingredient. This is not reflected in the extracted text. It was skipped.
-DataDocument: comfort exhilarations wild bluebell and bergamot concentrated fabric conditioner-- missed one of the ingredients, but I added it.
-The msds sheets that had double or triple the same ingredient and function are: DataDocument: comfort lavender concentrated fabric conditioner, DataDocument: comfort tropical burst concentrated fabric conditioner, DataDocument: dove bar fresh touch, DataDocument: dove bar pure and sensitive, DataDocument: dove bar restore, DataDocument: dove bar shea butter, DataDocument: dove bath almond cream, DataDocument: dove bodywash energize, DataDocument: dove bodywash go fresh burst, DataDocument: dove bodywash go fresh fresh touch, DataDocument: dove bodywash men + care aqua impact, DataDocument: dove bodywash men + care extra fresh, DataDocument: dove bodywash shea butter, DataDocument: dove liquid hand wash energize, DataDocument: dove liquid hand wash silk, DataDocument: dove liquid hand wash velvet, DataDocument: dove lotion proage, DataDocument: dove men + care face cleansing deep clean, DataDocument: dove men + care face cleansing revitalise, DataDocument: dove men + care shave cream hydrate, DataDocument: radox shower essential soft care,
-Ended QA at 20%
Complete QA for the Unilever Ingred. Disclos. QA group. http://factotum.epa.gov/qa/
*Note - for this QA group, you will only be QAing the chemical name, functional use, and ingredient rank (i.e., the rank in the list - 1st ingred, 2nd ingred, etc). The weight fraction data is not* included on the original data document and that is ok - just ignore these fields and you can still approve the QA as long as the other pieces are correct.
*Also note that some of the original data documents appeared to have errors (e.g. water was listed 5 times in a row as an ingredient). This duplication has been removed with the extracted data. If you encounter a data document that has this type of duplication, just note it in QA notes and you can approve the document if everything else is right (assuming duplicate chemicals in a list are ignored).