Open goerz opened 1 year ago
Good catch! Thank you.
I don't see the issue in parsing entries that are not fitting exactly BibTeX format description. As long as it doesn't conflict with the format, I am fine with any addition.
Adding the option to parse without errors, both string entries in your example should be quick (I am quite busy until mid-March though). However, it also touches one issue that is to handle and/or replace the entries of @string
in the parsed bibliography. I will try to get all of those done during March.
No rush… I can work around this and #32 by adjusting the .bib file a bit, so it's not really a dealbreaker. Maybe I'll have a look at if I can make a PR to fix this, too.
The parsing of
@string
entries seems to have some bugs:results in
The first
@string
using braces instead of quotes may not actually be in line with the description at http://www.bibtex.org/Format/, but it is definitely accepted bybibtex
, and, more importantly, it's what BibDesk generates. The second@string
with a space before the opening brace is directly from http://www.bibtex.org/Format/. It's not a format I personally use, but it should definitely be valid.