search

HydraCG / Specifications

Specifications created by the Hydra W3C Community Group
Other
139 stars 25 forks source link

Rename manages to memberAssertion #150

Closed asbjornu closed 3 years ago

asbjornu commented 6 years ago

Can we please rename the manages property wrt. collections to contains? I just find the latter to be so much more self-descriptive than the former.

tpluscode commented 6 years ago

For reference here's some prior discussion on this subject: https://www.w3.org/community/hydra/wiki/Collection_Design

Especially down at the bottom is a list of suggested names

elf-pavlik commented 6 years ago

I think we should name it in a way that relates to Triple Pattern Fragment work, I opened #142 as a broader issue for how manages block and TPF do fit together.

Since we discuss hydra:memberTemplate in #16 IMO we should stay away from template for current manages block. How about memberPattern since we use triple patterns?

contains might come confusing given already existing ldp:contains

alien-mcl commented 5 years ago

It seems that the 'manages' term is somehow unacceptable and there are other ideas of renaming it - I'm reopening it

asbjornu commented 5 years ago

As discussed on Slack, memberAssertion better describes what this property means. If it hadn't been for the collision with rdf:predicate, predicate would have been the perfect name for this property imho, but alas.

alien-mcl commented 3 years ago

PR #219 covers this issue - closing