Closed lanthaler closed 5 years ago
i would like to add way to negotiate vocabularies... one could offer/request FOAF or Schema.org version of same resource foaf:Person || schema:Person, similar with gr:Offer || schema:Offer
@elf-pavlik negotiating vocabularies is an interesting suggestion. Is that already done anywhere else?
Thomas Hoppe said on the mailing list:
I suggest this as a staring point [for a CRUD vocabulary]:
GET RetrieveResourceOperation POST AppendResourceOperation (ID is generated and not provided in the POSTed data) PUT CreateOrReplaceOperation (ID is provided within the PUTed data) PATCH UpdateResourceOperation (Single or multiple property updates) DELETE DeleteResourceOperation
The given HTTP actions are not a strict mapping but merely a "best fit" suggestion how they could map to the operations. There is also a corresponding discussion on SO. The operations itself should be self explaining.
Due to lack of activity in this issue, I'd like to close it. Still, whole this GitHub repo is a great place for suggesting features!